SnapNSTI

Prospective international study of necrotizing soft tissue infection.

SnapNSTI banner graphic

SnapNSTI is an international, time-bound prospective observational cohort study that characterizes the epidemiology, debridement timing, antimicrobial management, adjunctive therapy use, and 90-day outcomes of necrotizing soft tissue infection under real-world acute care conditions. The platform produces decision-facing observational evidence while preserving the temporal structure required for design-first causal analyses of operative timing and related management pathways.

Last updated: 2026-05-05 Protocol v1.1 · 2025-12-08 ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT07107555

Leadership and governance

Study coordination and collaborative structure.

Gary Alan Bass

Principal Investigator

Gary Alan Bass, MD, MSc, MBA, PhD, FICS, FEBS (Emergency Surgery)
Assistant Professor of Surgery and Assistant Professor of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
gary.bass@pennmedicine.upenn.edu

Steering group

SnapNSTI is coordinated through CESOR with scientific oversight from an international steering structure that includes representatives from ESTES, ASGBI, SIS-NA, and SIS-E alongside senior surgical and methodological collaborators.

Authorship and data governance

Primary and subsidiary manuscripts follow an ICMJE-aligned, contribution-based framework with CRediT role reporting, manuscript-specific writing committees, and structured steering review for secondary analyses.

Why this study exists

NSTI is rare, lethal, and marked by persistent practice variation.

Necrotizing soft tissue infection remains one of the highest-acuity emergencies in surgery. Mortality stays substantial despite advances in critical care, broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, and aggressive operative source control. Yet prospective multicenter data on how patients are diagnosed, triaged, debrided, supported, and followed are still thin.

SnapNSTI addresses that gap. It captures management with admission-relative timing, explicit documentation of treatment pathways, and standardized definitions across centers so the field can distinguish descriptive variation from questions mature enough for causal analysis.

Primary outcome

90-day mortality

All-cause mortality through 90 days after admission

Secondary outcomes

Organ failure-free days

Plus complications, reintervention, LOS, and short-term recovery

Time zero

Hospital admission

All major temporal variables are captured relative to admission

Scale

50 international centers

Targeting roughly 480 participants across Europe and North America

Design

What SnapNSTI measures.

Prospective cohort platform

International multicenter enrollment of consecutive adult NSTI cases using standardized snapshot methodology and routinely collected clinical data only.

Admission-relative timing

Key events are recorded as intervals from hospital admission to preserve temporal ordering for analyses of debridement timing, antimicrobial concordance, and downstream outcomes.

Operative and antimicrobial detail

The platform captures diagnostic pathway, timing to source control, microbiology, empiric and culture-concordant therapy, repeat debridement, organ support, and complications.

Adjuncts and recovery

Structured fields cover adjunctive therapies such as IVIG, hyperbaric oxygen, NPWT, fluorescence-assisted imaging, and 90-day recovery including optional PROMs where locally approved.

Prespecified analytic program

Three core manuscript domains.

M1

Timing and systems

  • Early versus delayed debridement using a design-first framework
  • Primary causal emphasis on timing of operative source control
  • Delay decomposition into physiologic necessity versus system-mediated delay
  • Decision-facing question: should we operate earlier, and are delays modifiable?

M2

Microbiology and antimicrobial strategy

  • Empiric antimicrobial concordance against final microbiology and susceptibility data
  • Interaction with surgical timing and source control
  • Primary outcomes: mortality and organ failure-free days
  • Question: does antimicrobial accuracy matter beyond surgery?

M3

Adjunctive and technology-assisted therapies

  • IVIG, HBOT, NPWT, and fluorescence-guided approaches
  • Focus on utilization patterns, indication mapping, and between-center variation
  • Adjusted observational associations rather than overclaimed causal effects
  • Question: are adjuncts used rationally and consistently?

Spin-off work

Classification and risk stratification

  • Evaluation of existing NSTI classification systems
  • Potential data-driven phenotyping
  • Validation of LRINEC and related risk tools
  • Emphasis on prognostic discrimination and clinical utility

Design discipline matters here. SnapNSTI is not a registry-shaped dataset. Its value depends on preserving the timing, feasibility, and pathway detail required to separate descriptive benchmarking from clinically interpretable analysis.

The platform therefore pairs broad international case capture with structured data quality control, prespecified analytic domains, and explicit governance over data use, authorship, and subsidiary analyses.

For participating centers and collaborators

How to engage with the study.

SnapNSTI is for centers able to support consecutive prospective case ascertainment, structured data entry, local governance approval, and 90-day follow-up using routine clinical data. Methodologic collaborators, infectious disease experts, analysts, and implementation scientists are considered through CESOR participation pathways.

For participating centers

Site interest and onboarding

Centers interested in participation should contact the study leadership and submit structured intake through CESOR.

For analysts and collaborators

Methods, microbiology, and implementation work

Collaborators with relevant statistical, microbiologic, critical care, implementation, or emergency surgery expertise should review CESOR participation pathways before outreach.