Describe capability
Record availability, operational hours, staffing, procurement, funding, governance, training, and audit arrangements.
EGS-READI maps how emergency general surgery centres access, govern, and use digital and imaging technologies in routine care.
Anonymous centre-level responses · no patient data collected
Gary A Bass (CESOR, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA) · Ana Maria Gonzalez-Castillo (Barcelona, Spain) · Hayato Kurihara (Milan, Italy) · Mauro Zago (Italy) · Olga Rutka (Liverpool, UK) · Matti Tolonen (Helsinki, Finland) · Stefano PB Cioffi (Milan, Italy) · Michel Altomare (Milan, Italy) · Octavian Andronic (Bucharest, Romania) · Krstina Doklestic (Belgrade, Serbia) · Eduardo Perea Del Pozo (Seville, Spain) · Diego Mariani (Milan, Italy) · Isidro Martinez-Casas (Seville, Spain).
Technology-specific studies tell only part of the story. EGS-READI describes the structures that determine whether a service can adopt, sustain, and use enabling technologies safely and equitably.
Record availability, operational hours, staffing, procurement, funding, governance, training, and audit arrangements.
Show how real-time data access, EHR integration, and structured perioperative pathways differ between services.
Identify capability gaps and centres interested in future implementation studies or collaborative snapshot audits.
One response should represent the institution’s capability, not an individual clinician’s personal practice.
Availability, use, funding, training, governance, and 24/7 operational access.
Infrastructure, staffing, credentialing, case mix, and practical readiness for urgent use.
Imaging interpretation, prediction tools, interoperability, governance, and perceived value.
Structured pathways, risk stratification, EHR integration, dashboards, and implementation maturity.
A comparator for operative infrastructure, equipment reliability, staffing, and workflow maturity.
Approved, deidentified REDCap summaries are refreshed here as the survey dashboard changes. The view stays at centre level and contains no patient-level data.
Markers show the number of completed centre responses grouped by country. Non-responding countries remain visible in a neutral layer.
Institutional setting reported by participating respondents.
Counts are reported in aggregate.
Each row shows the current reported status of one enabling technology or benchmark capability.
The page reads only approved aggregate fields from the public dashboard and fails closed when a current release is unavailable.
The survey is intended for surgeons and EGS leads who can describe their institution’s current capability. Responses are anonymous unless contact details are volunteered for future work.
EGS-READI is a non-interventional survey of institutional infrastructure, governance, funding pathways, and digital capability. It does not involve patients or collect individual-level clinician data.
Study lead: Gary A Bass, MD MSc MBA PhD MRCS MRCSI FICS FEBS (Em Surg).